Header image  
Bethany Sound Training
 
BACK   |   HOME   |  
 
 
 
Microphone Information

 

MICROPHONES – Condenser / Dynamic / Polar Patterns
 
I mentioned condenser microphones and dynamic microphones but did not explain them (I will also explain polar patterns…how a microphone hears).  I will explain them in detail now.
Condenser - Definition: Condenser Microphone:
 
“A condenser, or capacitor (same thing), Mic capsule has a conductive diaphragm and a metal backplate placed very close to the diaphragm. They are charged with static electricity to form two plates of a capacitor. When sound waves strike the diaphragm, it vibrates, varying the spacing between the plates. In turn, this varies the capacitance and makes a signal analogous to the incoming sound waves. There are two types of condenser Mic’s: the true condenser and the electret condenser. In the true condenser, the diaphragm and backplate are charged with a voltage from a circuit (The 48V phantom power). In the electret, the diaphragm and backplate are charged by an electret material, which is in the diaphragm or on the backplate. All true condenser Mic’s need a power supply to operate, such as a battery or phantom power. In general, condensers have a smooth, detailed sound with a wide, flat frequency response – usually up to 15kHz – 20kHz (15,000-20,000 Hz), useful for cymbals or instruments that need a detailed sound, such as an acoustic guitar, strings, piano, or voices. Condenser Mic’s tend to be more expensive and fragile than dynamic microphones. Note that omnidirectional condenser Mic’s have deeper lows than cardioid (polar pattern) condensers, making the omnidirectional (polar pattern) condenser a good choice for pipe organs and bass drums”.
Definition: Diaphragm:
 
“The membrane part of a microphone’s capsule or cone of a loudspeaker that moves in response to sound waves or an incoming signal, respectively”.
Definition: Electret Condenser:
 
“If two metal plates have molten wax poured between them and a high DC voltage is sent across the two plates, this assembly yields a permanent electric field, in the same way that a magnet produces a permanent magnetic field. It is hypothesized that the polar molecules in the wax align, then producing the electric field. An assembly of this type is used to provide a polarization voltage for small condenser microphones so that they do not require phantom power at 48V, but operate instead at a small pre-amplified voltage of 5V – 12V. Microphones constructed in this way are called electret microphones”.
Dynamic - Definition: Dynamic Microphone:
 
“In a dynamic microphone there is a moving coil in a magnetic field which generates electricity. Two types of dynamic microphones are the moving coil (dynamic mics) and ribbon. (moving coil mics are typically referred to as dynamic mics, while ribbon mics seem to be called ribbon mics). Dynamic mics have a rougher response than condensers or ribbons, and can be used to soften fine detail in the recorded sound. A well-designed moving-coil dynamic mic can handle very loud sound without distortion, and so is preferred for Mic’ing guitar amps and drums. Dynamic mics also have a pronounced presence peak that gives the sound an edge or punch”.

Basically a ribbon mic falls under the category of a dynamic microphone. Never referred to as a dynamic microphone, but as a ribbon mic because of how fragile it is, how expensive it is, and how much of a different sound it produces.

Definition: Moving Coil:
 
“In a moving coil mic, a coil of wire is attached to a diaphragm and is suspended in a magnetic field. When sound waves vibrate the diaphragm, the coil vibrates in the magnetic field and generates an electrical signal similar to the incoming sound wave. For some reason, moving coil mics are called dynamic microphones, but not ribbon microphones”.
Definition: Ribbon Microphone:
 
“A type of dynamic microphone which has a thin metal foil, or ribbon, suspended in a magnetic field. Sound waves vibrate the ribbon in the field and generate an electrical signal. Ribbon mics are usually quite fragile, but are used for their warm, smooth tone quality. They work well with digital recording and on brass instruments to mellow the tone. Ribbon mics are either figure-eight (polar pattern) or cardioid (polar pattern)”.
POLAR PATTERNS
CARDIOID
SUPERCARDIOID
HYPERCARDIOID
• Cardioid: “Heart-shaped” pattern that offers maximum rejection (null) at the rear of the microphone.
• Supercardioid: Has a narrower pickup pattern than cardioid, but also has some rear pickup. Note that there are two nulls of maximum sound rejection.
• Hypercardioid: Has a narrower pickup pattern than supercardioid, but also has more rear pickup than supercardioid. Note that there are two nulls.
OMNIDIRECTIONAL

HALF-OMNIDIRECTIONAL

BI-DIRECTIONAL

(FIGURE 8 )

• Omnidirectional: Picks up equally in all directions.
• Half-omnidirectional or hemispherical: Picks up equally over a 180° spherical angle. This is the pickup pattern of PZMs.
• Bi-directional (figure-eight or cosine): Picks up mainly in two directions (in front of and behind the mic) and rejects sound from the sides.
 
TRAITS OF DIFFERENT POLAR PATTERNS
 
Omni-Directional
 
• All-around pickup
• Most pickup of room reverberation
• Not much isolation unless you mic close
• Low sensitivity to pops (explosive breath sounds)
• No up-close bass boost (proximity effect)
• Extended low-frequency response in condenser mics.
Great for pipe organ or bass drum in an orchestra or symphonic band.
• Lower cost in general
Unidirectional (cardioid, supercardioid, hypercardioid, hemispherical, half-cardioid, half-supercardioid)
 
• Selective pickup
• Rejection of room acoustics, background noise, and leakage
• Good isolation–good separation between recorded tracks
• Up-close bass boost (except in mics that have holes in the handle)
• Better gain-before-feedback in a sound-reinforcement system
• Coincident or near-coincident stereo Mic’ing
• Broad-angle pickup of sources in front of the mic
• Maximum rejection of sound approaching the rear of the mic
Supercardioid
 
• Maximum difference between front hemisphere and rear hemisphere pickup (good for stage-floor Mic’ing)
• More isolation than a cardioid
• Less reverb pickup than a cardioid
Hypercardioid
 
• Maximum side rejection in a unidirectional mic
• Maximum isolation–maximum rejection of reverberation, leakage, feedback, and background noise
Bi-directional
 
• Front and rear pickup, with side sounds rejected (for across-table interviews or two-part vocal groups, for example)
• Maximum isolation of an orchestral section when Mic’ed overhead
• Blumlein stereo Mic’ing (two bi-directional mics crossed at 90 degrees)
What is a PZM Microphone (Pressure Zone Microphone)?
 
The PZM has a hemispherical pickup pattern when used on a boundary like a floor, wall, ceiling or tabletop. Another way to look at that is to say that it is omnidirectional above the boundary plane. This makes sense when you consider that it generally can’t pick up sound from behind the boundary.
Basically the PZM Microphone is a microphone that sits flat on the surface of any object picking up everything above and around it. Because it lies on the floor this prevents phase issues and timing differences because everything arrives at the point of pickup at the same time.
PZM MICS
 
 
Microphone Pickup Angle
Definition: Microphone pickup angle:
The angle in front of a microphone where a sound source can be located without a noticeable change in loudness.
For unidirectional microphones (cardioid, supercardioid, etc.), the angle from the center-line to the point where the output of the mic is noticeably lower (3 dB down) is one half of the pickup angle. The typical pickup angle of a cardioid microphone is 131° (65.5° to either side of the center-line of the microphone).
 
Microphone Pickup Angles
Omnidirectional
-
360°
Cardioid
-
131°
Supercardioid
-
115°
Hypercardioid
-
105°
 
Microphone Performance in the Direct Sound Field
 

The direct sound field is defined as sound reaching the microphone directly from the sound source without having been reflected off walls, ceilings, floors or other reflective surfaces.

In the direct sound field, the null of the pickup pattern can be directed at an unwanted sound source, thus substantially reducing feedback or sound leakage.

 
 
Question: What is the best pickup pattern to use in conjunction with a floor monitor? Why?
Answer: Usually cardioid, because it’s easy to aim the rear null of the cardioid pattern at the monitor.
 
Microphone Performance in the Reverberant Sound Field

The reverberant sound field is defined as all sound reaching the microphone that is reflected off walls, ceilings, floors, and other reflective surfaces.

In the reverberant sound field, the null of the pickup pattern cannot be used to control offending sound sources. However, a unidirectional pickup pattern, compared to an omnidirectional pattern, will provide improved gain-before-feedback and lower ambient sound pickup. In this situation, the narrower the pickup pattern, the better the performance, with the Hypercardioid being the best, followed by the supercardioid, followed by the cardioid.
As a gauge of performance, a microphone pickup pattern has an associated directivity index (D.I.). The greater the index number, the narrower the pickup pattern.

Pattern
Directivity Index
dB of Reverb Rejection
Omnidirectional
1.0
0 dB
Cardioid
1.7
4.8 dB
Supercardioid
1.9
5.7 dB
Hypercardioid
2.0
6.0 dB
 
Example:
 
The reverberant field efficiency (D.I.) of a supercardioid is 1.9 times better than that of an omni – a 5.7 dB improvement. This means that the supercardioid picks up 5.7 dB less reverb than an omni when both mics are in a reverberant sound field.
Question: Compared to an omni in the reverberant sound field, how much improvement in gain-before-feedback can be realized by replacing the omni with a cardioid?
Answer: 4.8 dB.

 

Question: If an omni in the reverberant sound field is placed 1 foot from a person speaking, how far away could a Hypercardioid be placed from the person speaking and yield the same result?
Answer: 2 feet.

 

The 3 to 1 Rule
Suppose you have set up several microphones to pick up sound sources. Each sound source has its own close-placed mic. You are mixing the mic signals through a mixer.

Sound from a single source arrives at each microphone at a different time. So, a mic that is distant from the source is picking up the source with a delay, which causes variable phase shift vs. frequency. When you combine the close and distant mic signals in your mixer, certain frequencies cancel out due to phase interference, creating a “comb-filter” effect. The frequency response of a comb filter has a series of peaks and dips (see figure below.) This response often gives a thin, hollow, filtered tone quality.

Audible comb filtering can occur whenever two or more mics pick up the same sound source at about the same level but at different distances, and are mixed to the same channel.

This problem can be minimized or eliminated by following
the 3:1 rule: Separate the mics by at least 3 times the mic-to-source distance. This creates a level difference of at least 9 dB between microphones, which reduces the comb-filter dips to an inaudible 1 dB or less.

In general, place mics close to their sources and keep the mics far apart to prevent audible comb filtering.
This figure shows how to mic two sound sources with two mics while following the 3:1 rule. If the mic-to-source distance were 2 feet, the mics should be at least 2×3 or 6 feet apart to prevent audible comb filtering.

The left-side frequency response results when two mics are mixed to the same channel at equal levels, and you followed the 3:1 rule.
The right-side response results when you don’t follow the 3:1 rule.

 
 
Microphone Techniques for Lecturer and Stage
A microphone positioned above or near a reflective surface receives a direct signal from the sound source, and a reflected signal from the surface. Because sound takes time to travel, the reflected signal arrives at the microphone later than the direct signal. The direct and delayed signals combine at the mic diaphragm. This causes an uneven frequency response (see below) called a “comb filter effect,” which results in an unnatural sound quality.
BAD

The figure above shows a poor way to mic a person at a lecture. The microphone is too far away from the mouth, resulting in pickup of reflected sound from the lecturer’s surface. This will result in an audible comb-filter effect, which sounds hollow or tonally colored.
The figure below shows a better way to mic a person at a lecture. The microphone is close to the mouth (about 8 inches). The sound reflected from the lecturer arrives toward the rear of the mic, where sound is rejected (null point). This will greatly reduce the audible comb-filter effect.

GOOD

The figure below shows an effective way to mic an actor on a stage. Use a boundary mic, which is designed with the mic capsule on or very near the reflected surface. In a boundary mic, the reflected path is nearly equal to the direct-sound path length, so the direct and reflected sounds are in phase. This will greatly reduce the audible comb-filter effect. To reduce feedback, use a Crown PCC-160 boundary mic (example), which is directional. For maximum clarity and gain-before-feedback, use a wireless lavalier mic on the actor.

- EXAMPLE -